False charge sheet -Documentary evidences
------------------------------------------------------
To whom so ever it may concern
-----------------------------------------
I am presenting here a story with few among many,
In order to attend my sick daughter V.Sruti Ranjani and her treatment and Surgery my husband had to apply for leave .The Bank management with a malafied intention to harass him treating his leave period as un authorized absence framed false charges .The charge sheet also included his period of his presence in the Bank.The Bank management made false allegations of indiscipline and mis conduct.It is worth mentioning here that his Leave record was either misplaced or wantedly distoyed
He was served with a Charge sheet on 14.05.2005 immediately after he resumed to duties after my daughter`s surgery at New Delhi..
The Disciplinary Authority without taking my husband`s reply to the charge sheet initiated inquiry proceedings.My husband sought all the relevant documents basing on which the Charges were framed .The Inquiring Authority and the Prosecution officer(P,O) have admitted that they do not posses any documents to prove the charges and the P.O admittedly stated that he needs some time to produce since he has to collect the documents from various branches to prove the charges.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
--
--
------------------------------------------------------
To whom so ever it may concern
-----------------------------------------
I am presenting here a story with few among many,
documentary evidences which throws light in to the high handedness and dis obedience o the law of S.B.I Mnagement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In order to attend my sick daughter V.Sruti Ranjani and her treatment and Surgery my husband had to apply for leave .The Bank management with a malafied intention to harass him treating his leave period as un authorized absence framed false charges .The charge sheet also included his period of his presence in the Bank.The Bank management made false allegations of indiscipline and mis conduct.It is worth mentioning here that his Leave record was either misplaced or wantedly distoyed
He was served with a Charge sheet on 14.05.2005 immediately after he resumed to duties after my daughter`s surgery at New Delhi..
The Disciplinary Authority without taking my husband`s reply to the charge sheet initiated inquiry proceedings.My husband sought all the relevant documents basing on which the Charges were framed .The Inquiring Authority and the Prosecution officer(P,O) have admitted that they do not posses any documents to prove the charges and the P.O admittedly stated that he needs some time to produce since he has to collect the documents from various branches to prove the charges.
Proof of missing leave records
Letters and Last pay certificates of Service Branch,Tilak Road (Tirupati Br and Ponduru Br,) in mconfirmity with the Statement of Bank`s Law officer in The Hon`ble A.P.H.R.C .Commission.
Veryy important
Leave record furnished under R.T.I act by Thr P.A,Ponduru (duly certified by Z.O Visakhapatnam dt10.08.2006 and 2507.2008.admitting that the Leave record is not available as per the Information given by the Z.O and Personal files
Certified Copy of the Complete,total .wholesome ,available Service record for the 37 years of Service of my husband Sri.V.Murali Mohan Only one page covering the period Febrauary 2002 to July2006
It is worth mentioning that :
1.The service record for the period 1971 to 2002 is not available
2. Not even a single adverse remark regarding the poor performance of my husbandhas been noted in the Service sheet instead ,there is a noting regarding the award of tophy to my husband for his performance as Cash officer during the year 2005 to 2006
3.The date of birth has been recorded as 05.05.1952 which is his correct date of birth.
The Chief General Manager who confirmed that it is the only Service sheet available with the Bank,has in his quasi apacity judiciary capacity has twice confirmed that `basing on the entire Service sheet available my husband`s performance was
I request the Finace ministry auhorities to take a note of this error committed by the then C.G.M
From: Srisuseela Mohan <srisuseelamohan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 8:22 AM
Subject: Fwd: Disciplinary proceedings-Ref:Your letter no.(3-0) (D.P.C)(V.S.P)281 dt.31.06.2006 enclosing Inquiry Authority`s report dt.25.01.2006.
To: "chairman@sbi.co.in" <chairman@sbi.co.in>
Fw: Fw: Disciplinary proceedings-Ref:Your letter no.(3-0) (D.P.C)(V.S.P)281 dt.31.01.2006 enclosing Inquiry Authority`s report dt.25.01.2006.
Date: Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 8:22 AM
Subject: Fwd: Disciplinary proceedings-Ref:Your letter no.(3-0) (D.P.C)(V.S.P)281 dt.31.06.2006 enclosing Inquiry Authority`s report dt.25.01.2006.
To: "chairman@sbi.co.in" <chairman@sbi.co.in>
Fw: Fw: Disciplinary proceedings-Ref:Your letter no.(3-0) (D.P.C)(V.S.P)281 dt.31.01.2006 enclosing Inquiry Authority`s report dt.25.01.2006.
 | | ||
V.Murali Mohan
Asst.Manager(Cash and Systems)
State Bank of India
Ponduru (Srikakulam Dt)
To
Sri.S.K.Chodhury
Deputy General Manger and The Disciplinary Authority
State Bank of India
Visakhapatnam Z.O
Visakhapatnam 530003
Dear Sir
Sub: Disciplinaryproceedings
Ref:Your letter no.(3-0) (D.P.C)(V.S.P)281 dt.31.01.2006 enclosing Inquiry Authority`s report dt.25.01.2006.
------------------------------
Wth reference to above ,I humbly submit that,the entire proceedings beginning from the show cause notice, framing of the charges and the conduct of the enquiry and ending with the inquiry report must confirm to certain well accepted principles of natural justice, that is, that—
(i) The enquiring officer must be unbiased and should not prejudge the case, and
(ii) The enquiry also must be fair and impartial by giving full opportunity to the delinquent to plead and establish his case.
In this connection,I further submit as follows:
i.The inquiry authority,did not base his conclusion ,on any incriminatory materials and in fact the documents of evidence submitted by the delinquent officer were ignored,which would have established the innocence of the delinquent officer..more importantly,since,the inquiry Authority conducted the inquiry without furnishing the crucial documents sought by the delinquent vide his request letters dt.06.09.2005 and 28.09.2005 and by with holding the list of witnesses and list of documents by whom and by which the articles of charges are proposed to be proved.
Secondly the inquring Authority totally relied on the falsely fabricated evidences of the Prosicution officer which were collected behind the back of the diliquent and the inquiring Authority did not take in to consideration , the diliquent`s argument that the evidences produced by the Prosicution officer are collected on a later date to prove the charges , are falsely fabricated.Hence it is a clear case of denial of opportunity o the delinquent in gross violation of `the principles of Natural justice'' according to the settled law.
ii.Since the delinquent officer was not furnished with the list of witnesses as mandated by Rule no.68(2) of the S.B.I.Officers` Service Rules on the grounds that they were not furnished by The disciplinary Authority to The inquiring Authority (Ref: Inquiry Authoritiy`s reply dt.15.09.2005 to the request letter dt.06.09.2005 of delinquent ,and more importantly since vital documents relevant to the charges were not furnished /with held from the delinquent ,it is apparent that ,the inquiry proceedings ,is contrary to the statutory prescriptions and reasonable opportunity was denied to the delinquent, to defend the charges and hence the entire disiplinary proceedings beginning from the show cause notice, framing of the charges and the conduct of the inquiry and ending with the inquiry report did not confirm to certain well accepted principles of natural justice, and there is a blatant violation of `Principles of Natural justice'. iThe enquiry was not fair and impartial since full opportunity aws not given to the delinquent to plead and establish his case.and it is very much evident that, (i) The inquiring officer is biased and prejudge the case.
iii.The delinquent has attached a new evidence i.e the ``Leave record dt 18.02.2006 ,which will the nature of the case the new evidence proves that the claim of the Disciplinary Authority , the Inquiring Authority and the Prosecution officer ,the Delinquent has no leave at his account is wrong and hence the charge of un Authorized absence is no true.
Fake leave record
----------------------------
Prayers
Therefore the on the basis of the available material which is not genuine,the impugned findings of the Inquiring Authority are found to be given arbitrarily without genuine material support and without giving a fair opportunity to the delinquent to defend his case by withholding the crucial documents and consequently the findings of the inquiring officer should be declared perverse and also the false charge sheet should be squashed.
Therefore the on the basis of the available material which is not genuine,the impugned findings of the Inquiring Authority are found to be given arbitrarily without genuine material support and without giving a fair opportunity to the delinquent to defend his case by withholding the crucial documents and consequently the findings of the inquiring officer should be declared perverse and also the false charge sheet should be squashed.
Ponduru Yours faithfully V.Murali Mohan
Dt.24.02.2006
(Diliquent officer)
I am proud to be an Indian!
I am proud to be an Indian!
